Remove abandoned description on README #222
Conversation
|
We also may want to remove the sponsoring button. CC @passcod |
|
I think we have enough maintainers on the team already that we don't need to state in the readme. We can leave the issue open if you want in case anyone else pops up in future. Also +1 on the sponsorship if passcod is fine with it, don't want to end up having to face the "who get's sponsored?" question |
JohnTitor
force-pushed
the
update-readme
branch
from
357b391 to
08b30e8
Compare
|
Remove description for looking for maintainers. |
|
Yes absolutely remove it. I really should have done so upon committing the notice, it was ambiguous/irresponsible in hindsight to leave it |
|
Also the changelog should mark the organisational change from me to y'all |
|
Should we do it with this pull request or another pull request? |
|
I think this PR is about to remove abandoned description, so for removing maintainers should do with another PR. wdyt @passcod, @Dylan-DPC |
|
I don't mind either way, but new PR would free this one to land without more delay I think |
|
So, could we merge this now? |
|
Yes. Let's merge this. Otherwise someone would come up with another change and we'll be stuck for a long time 😂 |
* Dependencies: Update winapi and remove kernel32-sys (#217) This removes the dependency on kernel32-sys, replacing the kernel32-sys calls with the appropriate winapi calls. * Remove abandoned description on README (#222) * Update info and bump to 4.0.15 * Fixup winapi Co-authored-by: Wesley Norris <repnop@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <huyuumi.dev@gmail.com>
Closes #221